Another challenge is knowing what to
cut. How much of a thing can be removed without destroying its
inherent truth? One answer, which is probably more accurate than
helpful, is as much as possible.
Then it becomes a question of
particles, of breaking down a work on an atomic level. What belongs
and what is merely scaffolding used to find the part that belongs?
It's impossible to know until that scaffolding has been lain and
examined.
* * *
There was a passage describing the lead
character's band. It isn't horrible, but it doesn't exactly belong.
It explains a situation that might not need explaining, at least not
there and then. Maybe later on, when we're in the middle of some
other scene, it will come up naturally. So for now it sits in a bin
marked “This might come in handy at some point, or not.”
Snappy name for a bin, no?
* * *
Also, how do we delineate time? Is it
always a forward progression, or can there be back and forth movement
like waves in the ocean, pushing and pulling? Think of brush strokes
on canvas. A sense of contiguity comes from discrete parts that
form the illusion of a unified object.
* * *
Meanwhile, this bird keeps perching
atop a pine tree in the backyard. Is it the same bird every time? Who
can know such things?
* * *
Questions keep coming, which is a good
thing. Without those, there is no need for answers. Without a need
for answers, there is no reason to keep going. Without a reason to
keep going... well, you see the problem there.
The bird flies off, then returns. It
keeps coming back, like so many questions. This might come in handy
at some point, or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment